but I don't think people want a ship that is uncharacteristic of the whole French BB line. You just know two years later they will take it out and replace it. Every time wg works on French lines they find some way to botch it as they did with France. Then you have a line that makes sense as someone of a strong French lineage I find it silly not to have a proper line. " This is from the Alsace proposals wg has project c at tier 9 where it would have belonged at tier 10 with project A belonging at tier 9. The project C was leading to an excess of nearly 2500 tons over the limit of 35,000 tons, so it was not proposed to the Chef d'Etat-major Général de la Marine. They had" Three projects were studied, the first (project A) with the same quadruple arrangement forward as Richelieu, but different secondary artillery dispositions, the second (project B) with one quadruple turret forward and one quadruple turret aft, the third (project C) with two fore triple turrets and one triple turret aft, in every case with a 380 mm caliber. France may be some design proposal they found and honestly it's not what the French would have laid down. Historically Richelieu and Jean Bart were the last French battleships laid down with two forward facing turrets. It's like having Izumo at Tier 10 instead of Yamato.what's France got secondary range yeah we have Glober Kurfurst which has that plus a decent turret layout. I think I am only doing up to the tier 9 since the tier 10 looks out of line with the rest of the tree.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |